Friday, June 24, 2011
REVIT is a stumbling block
of working or acomplishing a wonderful design.
It took 1/2 hour
REVIT expert. And, it just looks like it's gone, it's still actually
there, because we couldn't figure out how to delete it. Total cost to
delete the mullion to the customer, probably about $500. Is it worth
it REVIT?
I want to SMASH you
they way REVIT says it should. The help file is lame. People online
tell me what to do, but they are wrong, it does not work. Now, instead
of working this afternoon, I will spend several hours just trying to
delete a stupid mullion. SERIOUSLY!?!
Why no search?
through my views and sheets to find something without having to read
the titles of hundreds of views. Likewise in detail components, etc.
Why not have little icons of the detail components, views, etc? I
mean, I'm a visual person and it does take lots of time to read
through this stuff.
Disappearing!
you keep deleting things on me? Do you really think that because I
delete an object, that I also don't want the dimension? Do you really
thing it's useful for you to delete grids? Do you really think
deleteing or screwing up details is in MY best interest? This makes
me, and my firm look like fools. Do you think we want to look like
fools because of a stupid piece of stupid software? I guess you do,
because you are stupid.
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
REVIT is smart like a dog.
The room can be removed from any schedule or placed back in the
model using the Room command.
Yeah, because I really wanted that room I deleted to just hang around,
and need to be deleted twice. Because Revit is so smart. Smart like a
dog. Eats it's own Poo*
I just want to draw a door
draw it. I don't want to open 3 phases and 2 models just to put in a
dam* door. It's just a dam* door, not a frikkin' jet plane. Please for
the love of god. Please. It's just a dam* door.
Monday, June 20, 2011
A Fatal Error
have the opportunity to save recovery files for all of your changed
projects.Would you like to save a recovery file?.
-> Save recovery file under new name and exit
-> Exit without save
Hey REVIT - why don't you proofread your error messages! Dang lousy
software. And quit crashing you POS!
Therapy
1/2 hour
drink coffee while I wait.
Friday, June 17, 2011
A cool thing REVIT could do (but does not)
Turn off a level
a) less than 1 second
b) 2 seconds
c) 5 seconds
d) 15 seconds
If you guessed "d" you would be correct. In AutoCAD the answer is "a".
Slow save, slow open
Disappearing dimensions
No Fun
You got a teeny little pick box
what you want it to, it frequently picks the wrong thing, causing you
to attempt to select or repeat commands. This makes the actual
execution of each command extremely slow. Why can't you change the
size of the pickbox? Why can't REVIT be smarter about what you want to
select? I have a difficult mind/body (haptic) relationship with REVIT.
This creates stress, which should be unnecessary.
How to print a schedule in REVIT
legend but not a schedule? WTF! Because I really don't need to check
this stuff, because you are "so smart" that you just get it right by
yourself? Because I really want to print the entire sheet? Because I
want to take the extra steps to export to EXCEL? No, it's because you
SU**!
How to draw straight lines in REVIT
and LEFT ON? Yes, I know some commands allow ortho (constrain) but why
on earth would I want it to be off sometimes and on sometimes? What
were they thinking?
which would only take about 3 seconds in ACAD? Just select the items,
press delete...
Grrrr....
I'll give REVIT what it wants...
Thinks that the answer to REVIT is to give REVIT what it wants.
Last I checked, my computer and it's software works for me, not the
other way around.
A huge fail of "good versus bad technology". IE: technology that works
for me = good, technology that requires that I do certain things to
make it happy = bad.
LAME
POLYLINES, oh how I miss you
I need to have some lines that are linked (so I can edit them
together) or just figure out their length together. Filled Regions are
lame by comparison - for example, they need to be closed figures,
where a polyline has the option of being open.
REVIT wants you to know early on exactly what your building will look
like, how it will be constructed and exactly where the walls go.
For example, we model our building in 3d, but use 2d for other
drawings - wall sections (for example). This is NOT the correct way to
do it - REVIT wants you to generate wall sections from 3d, and use 2d
to "clean up" the wall section - to make it actually look correct.
However, if you do this, the wall section will contain a mix of 3d and
2d information. If you were to move your building wall, the wall
section will get scrambled as the 2d information tries to determine if
it should stay fixed in space, or move with the 3d information.
Thusly, the only really safe thing to do is to draw the entire wall
section in 2d, as a drafting view.
This applies to most of your other drawings as well - details,
elevations and building sections.
However, if you are doing most of your drawings in 2d, why would you
use REVIT?
One might say that the answer is simply to know early on what the
building looks like. I've never seen an architectural project that
didn't get SOME sort of change during construction drawings, often
extensive. Thus far, this appears to be a huge time suck during CD's
and potentially create huge liability issues when information
disappears completely from your REVIT drawing.
REVIT = FAIL